If you’re a leader of a public company, Hubbard says it’s important to always be prepared for the possibility of an unsolicited offer. This includes keeping your board of directors aware of factors like financial projections, your place within your industry, and any future growth opportunities, including acquisitions or sales.
“You have to continually assess all your strategic alternatives so that the board is ready to respond and weigh whether the value that’s being put on the table or the potential action that’s being suggested by activist shareholders is the right alternative,” he says. It’s important to remember that the board of directors is duty-bound to make the decision in the best interest of the shareholders, not necessarily you as a leader.
“If the board isn’t prepared, they have to quickly assess and assemble a team and then begin doing what should have been done on a quarterly or semiannual basis in order to respond in a more immediate and reasonable manner,” says Hubbard. “When you’re trying to react at the last minute, you tend to make mistakes or overlook things or act too quickly.”
There are other mechanisms that may help if you’re trying to ward off unsolicited bids, but they have potential consequences that should always be considered. One is often referred to as the “poison pill,” which can be implemented in multiple ways, but is aimed at making the company’s purchase less attractive to a potential buyer or takeover attempt. One tactic could be to have the management team threaten to resign in the event of an ownership change. This means new owners would have to replace company leadership and potentially lose institutional knowledge, but if the new ownership wants to overhaul operations, they may not look at that as a negative.
In another version of the poison pill, company leaders and employees, or shareholders friendly to leadership, may purchase more company shares at discounted prices through various means, making it more difficult for an outside entity to buy enough shares to take over the voting majority. Implementing an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) may be one way to give employees a bigger say in company direction and make it more challenging for outside groups to buy up shares.